During a Wednesday “town hall” hosted by CNN regarding “climate change,” Sanders accepted the premise of population growth on Earth being “unsustainable,” requiring government controls over procreati... View More During a Wednesday “town hall” hosted by CNN regarding “climate change,” Sanders accepted the premise of population growth on Earth being “unsustainable,” requiring government controls over procreation.
Sanders’s proposal, said King, reminded her of the 1973 dystopian science fiction film Soylent Green, in which overpopulation and poverty was addressed through euthanization of the elderly and processing their remains into food.
“In light of the shocking [statements] that we just heard about population control and all of that, cannibalism, many years ago, I watched a movie with Charlton Heston,” recalled King. “It was called Soylent Green, and they were concerned about population growth and all that and the old people were living too long, so they came up with this delicious wafer that they began to feed the public with, and it turns out that Soylent Green was people, the older people, and they were told that they were going to Nirvana… and then they processed them and put them in this little green wafer, and I thought about that when I heard this particular report, and I said, ‘My God, they’re turning us into cannibals.'”
CNN’s audience and its host, Anderson Cooper, offered no push-back to Sanders’s acceptance of “population control” as a government imperative.
Manning reflected, “The thing that shocked me is that Bernie Sanders can say what he said and essentially justify not just abortion, but essentially homicide, killing people, eliminating excess population, and he could say that, and people didn’t boo him overwhelmingly and say, ‘No, you don’t get to do that.'”
“They didn’t blink,” noted King of CNN’s audience’s lack of reaction to Sanders’s “population control” proposal.
Manning replied, “They accepted it out of hand, and it shows you the sickness that exists.”
King asked, “Do they even know who’s going to be chosen to be eliminated under such a plan? It might be them. They don’t think. Oh, my God.”
Left-wing desires previously withheld from the public are “in your face, now,” added King: “What makes him so bold that now he wants to put it out there for everybody to hear? That’s what I don’t understand.”
King remarked, “They kill babies in the womb, and that’s going to be the sick and the elderly, as well. You have to know that.
“Population control” measures will target “black and brown” people, determined King, highlighting the policy’s advocates’ justification of such a measure as a poverty-reduction strategy.
King said, “It reminds you of what Margaret Sanger said, ‘Colored people are like weeds that need to be exterminated. We don’t want that word to get out, so let’s get some of their ministers on our side, and they can keep the more rebellious ones — in other words, the ones who can think — in line.’ So this is not new. It’s been happening for decades and decades, but right now it’s really in our faces. So, what are we going to do about it? You’re doing something. You’re getting it out. You’re getting information out. I’m grateful to be invited to have this conversation with you this evening. So it is racist.”
Sterilization measures would be included in “population control” laws, King added.
“Their killing centers are on or near streets named after Martin Luther King Jr.,” said King of Planned Parenthood’s abortion centers. “They’re in the African-American communities saying, ‘Oh, we’re helping the underserved.’ Well you’re helping by killing the underserved? How is killing somebody going to serve them? Frank Pavone of Priests for Life said, ‘You’ve got to know the difference between serving the public and killing the public.'”
“Babies, sick, and old people, in that order,” King concluded. “If somebody’s sick, we have too many people, anyway. Don’t really try to treat him, just let him die comfortably. Euthanize him. Somebody’s old? Well, put them on the lower end of the healthcare providers. Babies in the womb? Well, we don’t know when they’re human.”
Breitbart News Tonight broadcasts live on SiriusXM Patriot channel 125 weeknights from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern or 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pacific.
Follow Robert Kraychik on Twitter @rkraychik.
Alveda King: Bernie Sanders’ Population Control Will Target Black Communities | Breitbart
“Population control” pushed by Bernie Sanders will target “black and brown” people, the unborn, sick and elderly people, said Dr. Alveda King.
Sanders: China Has Done More to Solve Poverty Than ‘Any Country in the History of Civilization’
https://nationandstate.com/2019/08/27/sanders-china-has-done-more-to-solve-poverty-than-any-country-in-t... View MoreSanders: China Has Done More to Solve Poverty Than ‘Any Country in the History of Civilization’
https://nationandstate.com/2019/08/27/sanders-china-has-done-more-to-solve-poverty-than-any-country-in-the-history-of-civilization/
“China is a country that is moving, unfortunately, in a more authoritarian way in a number of directions,” Sanders said. “But what we have to say about China in fairness to China and its leadership is, if I’m not mistaken, they have made more progress in addressing extreme poverty than any country in the history of civilization. So they’ve done a lot of things for their people.”
Here’s Bernie Sanders Getting Beat Up By A Punching Bag
Yesterday Beto O’Rourke demonstrated that he has no idea how to make a hamburger and effectively disqualified himself from contention in the 20... View MoreHere’s Bernie Sanders Getting Beat Up By A Punching Bag
Yesterday Beto O’Rourke demonstrated that he has no idea how to make a hamburger and effectively disqualified himself from contention in the 2020 presidential race. Today Bernie Sanders did his best to disqualify himself by showing off his hands and working a speed bag. In reality, the bag kicked his ass. This would be sad if Bernie had any dignity but he doesn’t so it’s absolutely hilarious.
Here’s what a 77-year-old communist looks like when he’s trying to punch a speed bag:
When it comes to the Democratic presidential field, bigger is not better
With 23 candidates, Democrats face a messy nomination process that gives Trump an opportunity to define them before they define themselves.
I think Oprah would be good
In 1998, Rep. Beto O’Rourke was involved in a drunk driving accident and arrested. The drunk driving along with and a separate arrest for jumping a fence onto the University of Texas El Paso grounds a... View MoreIn 1998, Rep. Beto O’Rourke was involved in a drunk driving accident and arrested. The drunk driving along with and a separate arrest for jumping a fence onto the University of Texas El Paso grounds are common knowledge, both to watchers of O’Rourke’s Senate campaign and his Congressional races before.
O’Rourke has spoken openly about both infractions, saying the drunk driving incident was a “serious mistake for which there is no excuse.”
Buuuuut, the police report of the 1998 drunk driving incident revealed a detail not previously disclosed. According to witness accounts, O’Rourke attempted to flee the scene of the accident.
From the Houston Chronicle:
>>> State and local police reports obtained by the Chronicle and Express-News show that O’Rourke was driving drunk at what a witness called “a high rate of speed” in a 75 mph zone on Interstate 10 about a mile from the New Mexico border. He lost control and hit a truck, sending his car careening across the center median into oncoming lanes. The witness, who stopped at the scene, later told police that O’Rourke had tried to drive away from the scene.
>>> O’Rourke recorded a 0.136 and 0.134 on police breathalyzers, above a blood-alcohol level of 0.10, the state legal limit at the time. He was arrested at the scene and charged with DWI, but completed a court-approved diversion program and had the charges dismissed.
In a statement issued Thursday, O’Rourke glossed over the allegation that he attempted to drive off (Chronicle ctd):
>>> In a statement Thursday, O’Rourke did not address the witness account of his alleged attempt to flee.
>>> “I drove drunk and was arrested for a DWI in 1998,” O’Rourke said. “As I’ve publicly discussed over the last 20 years, I made a serious mistake for which there is no excuse.”
Cruz’s campaign has declined to comment.
As National Review details, O’Rourke has used his past as a reason to pursue criminal justice reform:
>>> The Texas congressman and Senate hopeful has cited his past wrongdoings in justifying his support for criminal-justice reform.
>>> “Those mistakes did not ultimately define me or stop me from what I wanted to do in my life or how I wanted to contribute to the success of my family and my community,” O’Rourke wrote in an op-ed for the Chronicle published on Monday.
As these things go, the revelation is more likely to concern older voters than the younger crowd, who’ve largely embraced criminal justice reform for various reasons. Several polls show O’Rourke’s favorability lies mostly in the younger voting block, so the allegations are not likely to do as much damage as they might to another candidate.
Should the sins of youth forever prevent someone from achieving their dreams, particularly if those dreams are in public service? I don’t know. There’s certainly plenty of gray area there and room for discussion. The idea that one infraction disqualifies someone from a higher career goal is accepted everywhere but politics these days. That said, this is a question worth asking:
I hesitate to bring up youthful DUIs (see: Greatest Living President). But the question does have to be asked whether you or I – not the son of influential local judges – could drunk drive, hit a truck, spin into incoming traffic, try to run, and end up with charges dismissed.
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) August 31, 2018
It’s a cop’s nightmare… yet it’s also apparently a presidential candidate’s fantasy.
And it begs the question… when is our mainstream media going to stop being so in love with Beto O’Rourke that they’r... View MoreIt’s a cop’s nightmare… yet it’s also apparently a presidential candidate’s fantasy.
And it begs the question… when is our mainstream media going to stop being so in love with Beto O’Rourke that they’re willing to discuss the fact that he wrote a fantasy story in high school about killing children by running them over with his car?
In a recent report from Reuters, more disturbing facts are surfacing from Beto’s past.
The former Democrat Congressman from Texas, whose birth name is Robert Francis O’Rourke, shows a very troublesome mental health past. His writings, which can still be found online today, show severe mental instability.
“One day, as I was driving home from work, I noticed two children crossing the street,” O’Rourke wrote. “They were happy, happy to be free from their troubles …This happiness was mine by right. I had earned it in my dreams.”
“As I neared the young ones, I put all my weight on my right foot, keeping the accelerator pedal on the floor until I heard the crashing of the two children on the hood, and then the sharp cry of pain from one of the two,” O’Rourke continued. “I was so fascinated for a moment, that when after I had stopped my vehicle, I just sat in a daze, sweet visions filling my head.”
One of the worst scenes that every officer in law enforcement can ever arrive upon is the violent murder of children. Handling and investigating violent murders of children are the very types of severe job stress that induce many LEO’s to be later diagnosed with post traumatic stress.
The very fact that we have a man who is running for President of the United States who so descriptively wrote about murdering children should be a story that every mainstream media outlet would report, but sadly that is not the case.
What can be even more concerning is the way that Beto wrote about the horrific fantasy murders in first person. How he describes seeing the children happy and free from their troubles, and how he viewed their happiness as his, how he “had earned it in my dreams.” Lastly, describing how he had to stop his car after killing the children because he was “so fascinated” and “sat dazed, sweet visions filling my head.”
These aren’t the musings of a young teenage future president.
These are the evil musings of a murder.
If we were to take a look at the mental outlook of Beto O’Rourke, just as an investigator would when assessing a crime scene, there are a series of behaviors that stand out.
It is clear that the Democrat Presidential contender has a criminal history and the kind of dark thinking that could be extremely dangerous to America and perhaps the entire world.
Can we really trust a man who fantasizes about murdering children to be the leader and commander of the most powerful military in the world?
Here are the signs of instability that voters should consider.
First, O’Rourke who has Irish and Welsh ancestry, yet calls himself Beto to relate to Hispanic voters, is still not Hispanic. Yet he seems to think that changing his name from Robert to Beto will trick voters into relating through identity politics.
Second, O’Rourke has a criminal history. In high school, he was a member of the computer hacking group in the 90’s called, Cult of the Dead Cow, using the name “Psychedelic Warlord.” O’Rourke has admitted that during his computer hacking days, he stole long distance phone service to access boards so that he wouldn’t run up long distance bills.
This is a crime in Texas that starts as a misdemeanor, but if repeated enough times turns into a felony. He also used pirated software and cracked video games. This is quite the history of online theft.
In 1995, O’Rourke was arrested when he and his friends were arrested for burglary when they broke into the University of Texas at El Paso physical plant. Later charges were dropped. It is unknown whether his father’s political influence affected that decision.
Moving on from there, O’Rourke later received a DUI when he hit another car while driving under the influence in 1998 at 3:00 am in Anthony, Texas.
One has to ask after the way we witnessed the media’s handling of the Brett Kavanaugh hearings, where there was the most intense scrutiny into every single detail of Kavanaugh’s life, why is there a double standard being applied to a man who is running for President of the United States.
Honestly, what is the difference?
When comparing the Supreme Court to the office of the President, are not both positions worthy of equal scrutiny, if not more for a presidential candidate? Also, the detailed writings of murdering children reflects a darkness within a person that should cause an outcry among Americans. Yet sadly, we live in a time where that is not the case.
We have to ask ourselves why. Has our society’s moral decay caused this lack of care about the mental stability of a presidential candidate?
Or is it the mere reflection of the view of Democrat values when reflected on the value of the lives of children?
When you consider that only 17 days after Democrats voted to block the “Born Alive Bill” to provide medical care to babies who survive failed abortions, the same Democrats voted for the KITTEN Act, to save the lives of kittens from being “needlessly” euthanized after being used in research testing. The fact that Democrats voted to kill human babies and then turned around only 17 days later to fight to save kittens lives, just shows the moral fabric and view of the value of the lives of children in the eyes of the Democrats.
Given that the mainstream media is largely liberal with a heavy leaning toward Democrats, is this why they don’t care that Beto O’Rourke wrote murder fantasy stories about running down and murdering children?
The question needs to be asked because the truth matters. It is not a matter of whose truth you want to believe. There is only one truth, and it is undeniable.
Fantasizing about murdering children are the hallmarks of severe mental instability. Not the beginnings of an American President.
By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times - 3/4/19
The American Civil Liberties Union dealt a blow Monday to Democrats’ new election overhaul legislation, saying the bill does too much damage to the Firs... View MoreBy Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times - 3/4/19
The American Civil Liberties Union dealt a blow Monday to Democrats’ new election overhaul legislation, saying the bill does too much damage to the First Amendment and the storied rights group cannot support it.
ACLU officials said they support parts of the bill, such as making it easier to register to vote, but said the legislation attempts to control even the mere mention of a politician, which goes too far.
“They will have the effect of harming our public discourse by silencing necessary voices that would otherwise speak out about the public issues of the day,” the ACLU’s national political director and senior legislative counsel wrote in a 13-page letter announcing opposition.
Democrats plan to put the bill, H.R. 1, on the chamber floor for a vote later this week.
They’ve cast it as their top legislative priority, after saying last year’s elections were tainted by too many problems with voting, and too much money controlling the outcomes of elections and legislating.
The bill is going nowhere beyond the House. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Monday he won’t even bring it to his chamber’s floor.
But opposition from the ACLU could damage the bill’s bona fides with the left.
“When groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, who have traditionally supported the Democratic party, echo my concerns with H.R. 1, it underscores why election reform legislation should not be developed in a partisan manner,” said Rep. Rodney Davis, the top Republican on the House Administration Committee, which approved the bill last week.
The ACLU said it objected to lobbying restrictions Democrats wrote into the bill, saying they’re so broad they could prevent a former official from communicating with a senior government policymaker in any agency for up to eight years.
The group also said new disclosure rules are so broad as to be unworkable, preventing independent organizations from taking political action based on something they’d read or talked about even before someone became a candidate.
H.R. 1, Democrats' election reform bill, is unconstitutional, ACLU says - Washington Times
The American Civil Liberties Union dealt a blow Monday to Democrats' new election overhaul legislation, saying the bill does too much damage to the First Amendment and the storied rights group cannot ...
I was thinking of changing this page name to American Politics ... what do you guys think?
page=2&callback_module_id=pages&callback_item_id=152&year=&month=
View More
artcarnage likes this. 
lol
Tim BrownFounder