What is Agenda 21?
“The origins of the Environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968, when the CLUB OF ROME was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank, which specia... View MoreWhat is Agenda 21?
“The origins of the Environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968, when the CLUB OF ROME was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank, which specializes in “crises creation”. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. This was the instrument to be used to form the One World Government, also known as the New World Order.
The Global Warming scam
In a document called “The First Global Revolution”, authored by Alexander King and Bertrum Schneider, on pages 104 & 105 it states: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers of course will be caused by human intervention that will require a Global response.” That is the origin of global warming.
The Club of Rome members and ideology
In 1972 the CLUB OF ROME published the alarmist “LIMITS TO GROWTH” document, warning of world wide over-population and the need for “Sustainable Development”. This was the beginning of the slow process of social engineering and programming people to accept that the planet is “struggling” to sustain life.
On October 8th, 1973 the New York Times reported a quote from TED TURNER, also a MEMBER of the CLUB OF ROME, “The social experiment in China under chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.”
TED TURNER was also quoted in 1996 as saying “The total population of 250 to 300 million people is ideal. That means a reduction of 95% from present levels would be even more ideal. Anyone who abhors the China one child policy is simply a dumb dumb.” On July 7th 1998 the Baltimore Sun reported that most of Ted Turner’s first donation to the UN of 22 million dollars went to programs that seek to stall population. Another goal of the depopulation process is that the upcoming generation will submit to sterilization to save mother Earth.
From a report in the 1976 UN’s “HABITAT 1” conference, “Land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures of the inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefor contributes to social injustice.” In other words if you work hard, excercise good financial management and invest in property you are contributing to social injustice.
In 1992 came the EARTH SUMMIT, which produced the document called the EARTH CHARTER. This document was co-written by MAURICE STRONG, long time globalist elitist and MEMBER of the CLUB OF ROME and MIKHAIL GORBATJOV. Both Strong and Gorbatjov stated that “it was hoped that this document would be adopted as the new Ten Commandments, with Environmentalism as the new ONE WORLD RELIGION.” Out of this summit came Agenda 21.
Depopulation, resource theft and control via land grabs
In 1992 former US president GEORGE BUSH Sr. said “Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require profound re-orientation of human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and the individuals, in an unprecedented re-deployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level.”
Cutting through the code, everyone should consider what “profound re-orientation of human society” and “unprecedented re-deployment of human and financial resources” actually means. For everyone not familiar with Agenda 21, this is the beginning of the learning curve, not the end.
In 1992 MAURICE STRONG, Secretary General of the UN Earth Summit and MEMBER of the Club of Rome said “It is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning and suburban HOUSING are NOT SUSTAINABLE.”
Put those statements together with the previous one and it must become clear that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food and where we even live.
the New World Order, Smart Growth, Sustainable Development
In 1997 MIKHAIL GORBATJOV, also a MEMBER of the CLUB OF ROME said “We are moving toward a NEW WORLD ORDER, the world of Communism and we shall never turn off that road.” He also quoted in 1996 Monetary and Economic Review on page 5: “The environmental crisis will be the international disaster that will unlock the NEW WORLD ORDER, One World Government .”
DIXY LEE RAY, former Washington State Governor and assistant Secretary for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs stated “Agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transfering the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a WORLD GOVERNMENT and UN central direction.”
In a report from the President’s Council on Sustainable Development “We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions, more rapid change and more sensible use of human natural and financial resources in achieving our goals.” At the same time HARVEY RUVIN, Vice Chairman of the Wildlands Project says “Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.”
J. GARY LAWRENCE, advisor to President CLINTON’s Council on Sustainable Development stated “Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy fixated groups and individuals in our society. This segment of our society, who fear ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT and UN invasion through which our individual freedoms WILL BE STRIPPED AWAY, would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined the conspiracy by undertaking Agenda 21.
So we will call our process something else. We will call it COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING or GROWTH MANAGEMENT or SMART GROWTH.” We ended up with SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Austerity
The re-deployment of human and financial resources has now become visible to us all via the cuts to services and programs to assist the sick, the young, the elderly and of course the creation of another level of poverty, now identified by the term “The working poor”.
We see daily cash grabbing via new taxes called “levy” or “levies” supposedly because they’re strapped for cash in the governments, yet at the same time we see big project spending that does not fit with the message that we are in financial crisis. But we the people have to tighten our belts while the governments seem absolutely unaware or unconcerned with the amount of debt they are accumulating.
This in turn means that taxes, levies, fines and other penalties increase, as well as costs of living rising exponentially and the ordinary citizen’s ability to exist well is compromised with almost every law that gets passed. We’re constantly paying for so called services that we don’t receive.
This is “wealth risk re-distribution” at the grass roots level, “re-deployment” of financial resources insuring only hardship for the citizens who just really want to get on with their lives.
the Lima Declaration
In 1975 Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration, on the 2nd conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was the Lima Declaration, which was a blueprint for the re-deployment of tools, jobs and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs.
We can now see what the outcome of that has been for Australia, with unworkable trade agreements and tariffs that have followed as a matter of course. This is now a reality with around 90% of Australia’s agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima Declaration and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players. Whitlam, Frazier, Hawk, Keating, Hussen, Howard, Rudd, the Democrats, the “Greens” and even the Nationals.
All of these treaties are the foundation for the roll out of Agenda 21 and it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chess board and it’s so called leaders were either complicit or naiive to the long term consequences. Now Australia is almost at check mate.
The Australian parliament has also ventured into the rights of people to own and retain their property and manage it without government interference. In particular the laws around water allocation, natural resource management, the Native Vegetation Act, Development and Planning Act, which are all equally toxic to our food producers as they are to our long term security as city dwellers.
Everyone needs to remember we all pay a natural resource levy on our tax rates, so this is not just going to affect the food producers. The intrusions into our properties that land producers are going through will roll out into the suburbs and into the cities, because they have the authority to do that.
Parliament has already fiddled with land titles of people in rural areas with various legislations and the buzz words used to justify that was “Heritage Status”. At the same time that people’s right to own and manage our land, have access to water, produce adequate food to insure that our only option is not to consume often toxic and substandard food from places like China, our governments has been working overtime to take away our rights to “Common Law” through many pieces of legislation.
Common Law is what gaurantees us an ability to correct injustices. This coming year we will also hear debate over a number of pieces of legislation that will further erode our Common Law rights.
It’s wakey-wakey time
For way too long now we, the people, have been asleep at the wheel and it is time to wake up and participate in the democratic process or to return to common law sovereign Republics altogether. To do that you need to understand the parliamentary, governmental, or political system that you are trying to reign in.
Everything stated here can be verified by document searches. It is now time to take off our blinkers and encourage our neighbors to take off their blinkers as well. It’s also time for us all to demand that every person we elect fully understands this policy that is being rolled out via local, state and federal government at a concerning rate. We’re not talking about decades, we’re talking about only years before this is fully implemented.
Every day another law is introduced or passed to produce the end game of Agenda 21 being fully implemented. So the question that Lord Christopher Monckton asks “Carbon tax, climate change and Agenda 21, can democracy survive all three?” needs to be answered, and answered NOW.
We all need to find out from our elected leaders what they know of Agenda 21 and if they don’t know about it, educate them. If they don’t know it, push them to understand what they are voting on in government or parliament. This is a crossroad
The CO2 scam
It should be noted that the EPA (Environment Protection Agency) has NEVER had CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) on their list of air pollutants, nor does it to this day. Their list does include CO1 (Carbon Monoxide), ground-level ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and lead for it’s most threatening particulate matter pollutants.
These factory and societal pollutants absolutely need to be dealt with, but the idea of leaving a “carbon footprint” or paying to breath is ludicrous and comes straight out of the Club of Rome’s Agenda 21 land grab.
http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/
If you think CO2 and humans are the cause of this fear based global warming propaganda and have concerns over your “carbon footprint” you will want to pay full attention to the real science debunking this scam. This will be a great place to start educating yourself on the matter. The Club of Rome and their Agenda 21 lackeys and agents are suffering from “Traffic Light Syndrome”. They pretend to be “green” because they’re too “yellow” to admit they’re really “red”.
EXPOSING AGENDA 21, THE CLUB OF ROME, THE FABIAN SOCIETY AND THE BOGUS ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENTHOAX | Truth Serum News on WordPress.com
By AYS What is Agenda 21? “The origins of the Environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968, when the CLUB OF ROME was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank, ...
UNCTAD Youth Network Emerges As Key Driver of 2030 Agenda
The United Nations knows that it will the today's youth that implements 2030 Agenda and Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy.
Written By: David Bank, Dennis Price March 9, 2017
“Follow the money, follow the power.” Global corporations are brainwashing the global economy into funding the road to Sustainable Development, aka Te... View MoreWritten By: David Bank, Dennis Price March 9, 2017
“Follow the money, follow the power.” Global corporations are brainwashing the global economy into funding the road to Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy. ⁃ TN Editor
A year ago, every company had to have a Big Data story. Now, no initiative is complete without AI and machine learning. Extra points for “blockchain.”
Next up: companies, asset owners and fund managers touting their alignment with “the SDGs.” If you don’t know already, those are the Sustainable Development Goals, with colored icons to represent 17 ambitious targets world leaders agreed to reach by 2030.
The SDGs, sometimes referred to simply as “the global goals,” are the successors to the Millennium Development Goals, which through 2015 helped drive remarkable global progress against extreme poverty, hunger and gender parity in education. The new global goals are even more ambitious, covering developed as well as developing countries and presuppose an active role for private industry and private investors as well as the usual suspects of foreign aid agencies, development banks and philanthropies.
As such, the goals have become a unifying framework to tie together the disparate actions of corporations, non-governmental organizations, entrepreneurs and investors, as well as government ministries and traditional development players. In recent months, pension and sovereign wealth funds, as well as corporations and major banks and wealth managers, have declared their alignment with one or more of the Global Goals.
Whether that signals the opening of the spigots of private capital for goals such as end poverty in all its forms everywhere (No.1) or achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls (No.5) remains to be seen. Experts have pegged the incremental costs of hitting the SDG targets at $5 trillion to $7 trillion a year for the next dozen years or so. It may be more helpful to see the SDGs as a compass pointing to new market opportunities worth $12 trillion a year in savings and revenues.
Investing Frameworks
The interest among investment managers to map their investments to the SDGs has produced a welter of frameworks to turn the goals into actionable strategies. Reporting mechanisms and definitions vary from framework to framework, sometimes making integration difficult.
The Global Impact Investing Network last year called on impact investors to align investments with the global goals. The GIIN is mapping its widely used IRIS indicators to the SDGs. It has profiled the SDG investing strategies of New York fund manager Encourage Capital, Dutch pension fund PGGM and fund manager Triodos Investment Management, and RobecoSAM in Zurich (see, Call to Action: Align Global Assets with Global Goals).
“The SDGs help clients better understand the impact we create because now we can put our approach in a broader global context,” said RobecoSAM’s Daniel Wild.
Last year, Sonen Capital, a boutique impact investment advisor in San Francisco, mapped its investment strategies within the SDG framework. “SDGs are third-party universally recognizable objectives that provide additional framework for investment and have the potential to mobilize other stakeholders and significant capital in a coordinated manner to work towards achieving a common set of goals,” Raúl Pomares, Sonen Capital’s founder, told ImpactAlpha.
Funds that want to map their social impact have found the global goals provided a ready framework. Fifty Years, a venture fund in San Francisco with nearly two dozen investments in synthetic biology and food tech, health sensors and robotics, requires each one to be explicitly linked to one or more of the goals. “We were looking for the world’s biggest challenges,” Seth Bannon, co-founder and partner at Fifty Years, told ImpactAlpha. “The world’s best minds had already laid them out in the SDGs.”
With no single satisfactory way to apply the global goals to their own work, some organizations have developed their own SDG frameworks. Toniic, the global network of impact investors, is building its own map. “We couldn’t believe this hadn’t been done,” said Adam Bendell, Toniic’s new CEO, who plans to make the network’s framework available to other investors.
Read full story here… http://impactalpha.com/sustainable-development-goals-take-hold-as-a-universal-impact-investment-framework/
Sustainable Development Goals Take Hold As A Universal Impact Investment Framework
“Follow the money, follow the power.” Global corporations are brainwashing the global economy into funding the road to Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy. ⁃ TN Editor
The long-term objective of the Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative (C2G2) is to encourage dialogues on and to develop governance framework(s) for climate geoengineering.
Climate Geoen... View MoreThe long-term objective of the Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative (C2G2) is to encourage dialogues on and to develop governance framework(s) for climate geoengineering.
Climate Geoengineering (CGE) is defined as deliberate, intentional planetary-scale interventions in the Earth system to counteract climate change. There is increasing interest in CGE as the mitigation challenge of staying well below 2 degrees Celsius temperature rise—let alone 1.5 degrees—becomes more apparent. In the foreseeable future, governments or even non-state actors could turn to CGE options as a last resort or as means to buy time. Yet there is a considerable lack of understanding of the governance requirements of CGE. Furthermore, no comprehensive governance framework(s) exist for addressing CGE—technologies that fundamentally require multilateral governance approaches.
There is hence an urgent need for broad, inclusive global governance discussions regarding the research, possible testing and deployment decision-making process for CGE technologies that have significant, long-term and planetary-wide consequences for this and future generations. The C2G2 Initiative will address these issues by seeking to enlarge, accelerate and shift the discussion on CGE governance from academia to the intergovernmental policy community through systematic engagement with government representatives, intergovernmental and international non-governmental organizations, as well as other non-state actors.
Oh right. This would be the first time for US Gov spending? My ASS! They really expect us to believe that, so far, chemtrails, HAARP, etc., have been paid for by charitable donations?
Geoengineering Gets Green Light from Federal Scientists
For the first time, funding from the U.S. government may be spent on man-made approaches to ease climate change.
The Problem With 'Smart Cities'
There are alternative futures for cities, other than the 'smart city' meme touted by the United Nations and Technocrats everywhere.
U.S. 'Green' Architects Partner With U.N. To Support Agenda 2030
Technocrats are already heavily embedded in the fabric of American economic life, and the push for infrastructure buildout is relentless.
Local Agenda 2030 Is Inspired by Decades-Old Local Agenda 21
Local Agenda 21 'limited success' was devastating to local U.S. communities, but will direct Local Agenda 2030 to be the supercharged version of Agenda 2030
Satellite Real Time Ionization Chemtrails Manipulated EOSDIS
Must See! Satellite Real Time Ionization Chemtrails Manipulated EOSDIS
Weather Modification recorded as it Happens. Chemtrails then Ionizer Modification Italy Europe.
page=13&callback_module_id=pages&callback_item_id=64&year=&month=
View More
tami borsook and violentByBirth reacted to this. 
Tim BrownFounder